Monday, August 23, 2021

Buber and Rosenzweig- The Odd Couple Who Breathed New Life into Contemporary Jewish Thought

 

Our four great Jewish thinkers of the modern era-The unorthodox return to Orthodoxy without being Orthodox

My Discussion on Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig, August 14 and 21.


Discussion delivered on August 14:

Here is the link to the video on Martin Buber:

https://youtu.be/_tcOvjKWx2E

We now come in our discussions to thinkers who shaped our contemporary Jewish scene

I am dealing with them in pairs, that have opposites and a likes in tandem. Buber and Rosenzweig are Jews on the outside who come into the realm of Jewish thought. Kaplan and Heschel are Jews deeply immersed in the ancient Judaism who then seek to bring it to Jews who are on the outside. Jews on the Outside who come in from the cold.

Martin Buber



*I took graduate courses in psychology- noticed, in counselling texts, numerous reference to Martin Buber and Dialogue. *As a student in Rabbinical school,  it was popular to go about with pins in which was written the slogan: I-Thou ( Ich-Du).  *Buber was active with Zionism, and often spoke to my father’s youth group in Vienna ( together with Alfred Adler)

My father , a young member of the first chapter of Hashomer Hatzair in Vienna with Meir Yaari, founder of Israel’s Marxist-Zionist party, Mapam.

Notes from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Martin-Buber-German-religious-philosopher/From-mysticism-to-dialogue ( by Akiba Ernst Simon, one of my teachers and a member of the Frankfurt Lehrhaus

Martin Buber, (born February 8, 1878, Vienna—died June 13, 1965, Jerusalem), German-Jewish religious philosopher, biblical translator and interpreter, and master of German prose style. Buber’s philosophy was centred on the encounter, or dialogue, of man with other beings, particularly exemplified in the relation with other men but ultimately resting on and pointing to the relation with God. This thought reached its fullest dialogical expression in Ich und Du (1923; I and Thou).

From Vienna to Jerusalem

Buber was the son of …assimilated Jews… … brought up by his grandparents in Lemberg (now Lviv, Ukraine)[my mother’s home] The search after the lost mother became a strong motive for his dialogical thinking—his I–Thou philosophy.

Solomon Buber (1827–1906), the Lemberg grandfather, a wealthy philanthropist, dedicated his life to the critical edition of Midrashim, Mother also a “ maskil.” Not observant as a young man.

In his university days—he attended the universities of ViennaBerlin, Leipzig, and Zürich—Buber studied philosophy and art. ..The Nietzschean influence was reflected in Buber’s turn to Zionism and its call for a return to roots and a more wholesome culture.

… He was among the early protagonists of a Hebrew university in Jerusalem.

In 1916 Buber founded the influential monthly Der Jude (“The Jew”), which he edited until 1924 and which became the central forum for practically all German-reading Jewish intellectuals. Zionist-more closely cultural than political- Brit Shalom.

Buber took up the study of Ḥasidism. In Ḥasidism Buber saw a healing power for the malaise of Judaism and mankind in an age of alienation that had shaken three vital human relationships: those between man and God, man and man, and man and nature. They can be restored, he asserted, only by man’s again meeting the other person or being who stands over against him, on all three levels—the divine, human, and natural. Buber maintained that early Ḥasidism accomplished this encounter and that Zionism should follow its example.

 

[He was significant in opening the world of Hasidism to modern Jews, as well as Christians. The key criticism is that he “ cleaned up” the texts, reworded them to fit his theology, rather than present them as they were intended. He also himself avoided Hasidim. When he was a guest speaker at my Rabbinical school, one of my teachers asked him if he would like to attend a Hasidic shtiebel- he was absolutely uninterested]].

*******.

Buber’s manifold activities were inspired by his philosophy of encounter—of man’s meeting with other beings.

This basic view underlies Buber’s mature thinking; it was expressed with great philosophic and poetic power in his famous work Ich und Du (1923; I and Thou).

[FIRST-CLARIFICATION  -German, like French and other European languages has 2 forms for You-formal and informal ( or familial).Formal- Sie, Vous, Usted- as opposed to informal-Du, tu. Hebrew never had this distinction ( atah); English used to- hence, Thou as opposed to You. It is personal, intimate, as in Pennsylvania Dutch, not as in the “ Thou” used in later snob-speak]

Till today, his teachings are a very important part in what is called the third force in psychology: ‘humanistic psychology” (in  distinction from Freudian and behavioral): .

Core concept-self-actualization ( Carl Rogers , Abraham Maslow)  This is a link to  a very good description of his importance in the field of counselling: https://ct.counseling.org/2019/05/remembering-martin-buber-and-the-i-thou-in-counseling/

“Philosopher Martin Buber detailed the qualities that characterize a real “encounter,” or I–Thou meeting, between two people. His ideas remain as relevant today as when they helped to shape the humanistic movement in psychology and counseling.”


 A summary of his I-Thou:

According to this view, God, the great Thou, enables human I–Thou relations between man and other beings. Their measure of mutuality is related to the levels of being: it is almost nil on the inorganic and botanic levels, rare on the animal level, but always possible and sometimes actual between human beings. A true relationship with God, as experienced from the human side, must be an I–Thou relationship, in which God is truly met and addressed, not merely thought of and expressed.

Contrast with :I–It relationship, as in scholarly pursuits in which other beings are reduced to mere objects of thought or in social relations (e.g., boss and worker) wherein persons are treated largely as tools or conveniences.

Toward God, any type of I–It relationship should be avoided, be it theoretical by making him an object of dogmas, juridical by turning him into a legislator of fixed rules or prayers, or organizational by confining him to churches, mosques, or synagogues https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martin_Buber_1963c.jpg 

Very much a Rebbe, without Hasidim or Hasidism



An excerpts from his Tales of the Hasidim

·      

·         Sample Quotes:

·          

·         The true meaning of love one's neighbor is not that it is a command from God which we are to fulfill, but that through it and in it we meet God.

Martin Buber NeighborMeaning Of LoveCommand Martin Buber (2013). “On Judaism”, p.212, Schocken

·         All journeys have secret destinations of which the traveler is unaware.

Martin Buber InspirationalTravelFreedom Martin Buber (2015). “Hasidism and Modern Man”, p.47, Princeton University Press   

·         When two people relate to each other authentically and humanly, God is the electricity that surges between them.

Martin Buber LoveTwoPeople "Where is God in the Flood?" by Rabbi Avi Strausberg, www.huffingtonpost.com. October 17, 2017. 

·         The real struggle is not between East and West, or capitalism and communism, but between education and propaganda.

Martin Buber EducationRealStruggle "Encounter with Martin Buber". Book by Aubrey Hodes, 1972.

When people come to you for help, do not turn them off with pious words, saying, 'Have faith and take your troubles to God.' Act instead as though there were no God, as though there were only one person in the world who could help -- only yourself.

Martin Buber[based on a famous Hasidic saying on why God created atheism] PeopleWorldHave Faith

·         A human being becomes whole not in virtue of a relation to himself [only] but rather in virtue of an authentic relation to another human being(s).

Martin Buber VirtueRelationHumans

·         I do not accept any absolute formulas for living. No preconceived code can see ahead to everything that can happen in a man's life. As we live, we grow and our beliefs change. They must change. So I think we should live with this constant discovery. We should be open to this adventure in heightened awareness of living. We should stake our whole existence on our willingness to explore and experience.

Martin Buber KnowledgeLearningAdventure "Martin Buber: An Intimate Portrait". Book by Aubrey Hodes, 1971.

    

·         In spite of all similarities, every living situation has, like a newborn child, a new face, that has never been before and will never come again. It demands of you a reaction that cannot be prepared beforehand. It demands nothing of what is past. It demands presence, responsibility; it demands you.

Martin Buber

https://www.azquotes.com/author/2101-Martin_Buber


This is a great audio-visual explanation of Buber’s I Thou, and you can see how well it transfers to modern humanistic psychology. The sound went dead on this video clip during the recording so click on the link here:

https://youtu.be/16Cr82mLhkw

Buber in 10 minutes:by Eric Dodson.Prof Psych University of West Georgia.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**********************************************************************************************

The second of my “ Pairs” in Jews on the Outside who came in from the Cold

Shabbat August 24

Link to the discussion video 

Franz Rosenzweig

First published Fri Feb 27, 2009; substantive revision Mon Jan 28, 2019

Franz Rosenzweig (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/Franz_Rosenzweig.jpg



 

Franz Rosenzweig (1886–1929) ranks as one of the most original Jewish thinkers of the modern period.

. ...“total renewal of thinking” through a novel synthesis of philosophy and theology he named the “new thinking.”

 Rosenzweig’s account of revelation as a call from the Absolute other helped shape the course of early 20th-century Jewish and Christian theology. ...a lasting impact on 20th-century existentialism; ... dialogue presented the interpersonal relation between “I” and “You” as both constitutive of selfhood and as yielding redemptive communal consequences. (See Buber)... ... the German translation of the Bible in which he collaborated with Martin Buber. He founded a center for Jewish adult education in Frankfurt—the Lehrhaus

Key points:

From a very assimilated background... a near-conversion to Christianity, an inspired return to Judaism

the composition of the beginning of his magnum opus on military postcards sent home from the Balkan front,

 the abandonment of a promising academic career in order to live and teach in the Frankfurt Jewish community,

and his heroic efforts to continue his thinking, writing, and communal work after succumbing to the paralysis brought on by ALS.

...  the greatest work of modern Jewish philosophy: The Star of Redemption. The Star is a system of philosophy that seeks to give a comprehensive and ramified account of “All” that is, and of the human being’s place within that “All”.


***** His conversion almost to Christianity and back to Judaism:

 July 7, 1913, Rosenzweig engaged in an all-night discussion with Rosenstock and his (Rosenzweig’s) cousin Rudolf Ehrenberg ( baptized at age 11) …he later claimed to have spent the hours after the conversation alone in his room, pistol at hand, “face to face with the Nothing.” He emerged from the experience determined to convert to Christianity in order thereby to take up his place in the historical realization of redemption in the world.

[And then]

******

Franz Rosenzweig (jewishvirtuallibrary.org)

. Rosenzweig wrote to his own parents: "We are Christians in all things, we live in a Christian state, go to Christian schools, read Christian books, our whole culture is based on a Christian foundation." … Rosenzweig promised to get baptized. … one condition. He was, he said, not a goy, but a Jew, and wanted to take a closer look at the things from which he would be separated by this conversion. He asked his relatives for a time of contemplation and reviewing, a time of a last (or was it the first?) conscious participation in the "Ten High Holy Days from Rosh HaShanah to Yom Kippur. For him these became the "ten days of return" to his roots in Judaism…

 He expressed his resolve to reject conversion saying: "We agree …no-one comes to the Father but through him (Jn 14:6). No one comes to the Father - but it is different when somebody does not have to come to the Father because he is already with him. And this is so for the people of Israel …”

 

[What happened? He walked into a small Orthodox synagogue and came out converted. Note- not a liberal synagogue with organ, choir, the service more in German than Hebrew. It must have been incomprehensible for him. Yet it shook him.

His progress-deepening his Jewish study and exploring Jewish observance ( not totally Orthodox- example- on Tefillin- “ Not Yet”.]

(Stanford)

In 1914, already under [Herman] Cohen’s influence and unmoved by the romantic theology of Martin Buber popular at the time,[ his collaborator] Rosenzweig wrote his first essay in Jewish theology, “Atheistic Theology.” …only by taking the transcendence and at once the revelation of God seriously—rather than reducing the divine to an expression of a Jewish life force—can we grasp the split the human being experiences in history, between his personal self-realization and the realization of the world. It is the notion of revelation, Rosenzweig suggests, that allows us to view history along an absolute redemptive trajectory, established by God’s relation to the human being in the world. Such a notion of revelation would reappear at the center of Rosenzweig’s systematic work, The Star of Redemption, a few years later.

[Note-he is writing his thoughts on post-cards that he sends home form the battlefront of WWI]

His critique of Buber-they became good friends-( from Simon)

After the religious philosopher Franz Rosenzweig, Buber’s friend and fellow translator of the Bible, read Ich und Du, he remarked: “Buber gives more recognition to the ‘Thou’ than anybody before him, but he wrongs the ‘It’.” … While Rosenzweig tried to live it as much as possible and became more and more a practicing Jew, Buber stood his ground as one who embodied his Judaism in no prescribed, special manner.

**********************************************************

 

His contribution to world philosophy: The New Thinking:

The old classical philosophy has come to a dead-end

Abstracting from time. In their quest to grasp what is universally and essentially true, philosophers abstract from the temporal, relational context in which human beings experience the world around them. (Essence vs existence).

Reductive reasoning. The attempt to grasp what things are essentially inclines the old thinking to reason out a single ground for all beings, thereby reducing particular beings to something other than what they are. [reductionist fallacy]

Thinking from the Absolute standpoint. The quest for the most comprehensive answer to the “what is” question of the philosophical tradition leads the old thinking, in its German Idealist manifestation, to aspire to an “Absolute” standpoint from which the whole of what is—the “All”—can be grasped in its unity

 Rosenzweig proposes a “new thinking” that pursues knowledge of God, world, and the self in their interrelationsfrom out of the individual standpoint of the human being in time.

 For the new thinking suggests that one does not attain truth by stepping out of the river of time, but rather that truth is that which “unfolds in time.”

[roots of what becomes known as “existentialism.” Philosophers constantly sought the “ ‘essence’ of an object or person. Nomenon behind phenomenon. Modern philosophy rejected “essence” ( the metaphysical) but could address only the physical. In Existentialism, what counted was “ Existence”]

 

 

 

The Freie Jüdische Lehrhaus

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/community/articles/frankfurt-lehrhaus-a-century-later

(Joshua Krug)

The Freies Jüdische Lehrhaus, or Free Jewish House of Learning… an educational institution, and a practical model, meant to speak to Western Jews who were strangers, not “natives,” to Judaism. This Lehrhaus, or house of learning, a revamped beit midrash tailored to assimilated Jews, met in community buildings and rented halls. It lacked modern precedent. The educational experiment riffed on ideas emerging in Weimar Germany concerning adult education, as it synthesized critical academic study of Judaism with Talmud Torah (Torah study), toward a revitalized practice of adult Jewish teaching and learning. Here, Jews ignorant of, and alienated from, Jewish life and tradition acquired knowledge and understanding of Judaism and explored Jewish identity, on their own terms.

 

… in 1920, “a learning that no longer starts from the Torah and leads into life, but the other way round: from life, from a world that knows nothing of the Law, or pretends to know nothing, back to the Torah. That is the sign of the time.

Rosenzweig’s principle of “learning in reverse order” resulted in counterintuitive hiring practices. Largely assimilated, Jewish and Jew-ish characters from the German intellectual and cultural scene, often with limited Jewish knowledge, taught Judaism-related subjects.. [This was equivalent of the blind leading the blind as a new movement in education].

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/TheStarOfRedemptionEng.svgunity-

[ lecturers: doctor Richard Koch , the chemist Eduard Strauss , and the feminist Bertha Pappenheim and Siegfried Kracauer , a popular culture critic for the Frankfurter Zeitung . Among those who would later become famous were SY Agnon , who received the Nobel Prize in Literature, andvGershom Scholem , the founder of modern studies on Kabbalah . The expressionist writer Alfons Paquet , 1000 members in a community of 30,000-LA Limmud was happy to have 500 in a community of 500,000! I have to add that the Frankfurt Jewish community alone raised more charity to help the survivors of the Kishinev pogrom of 1904 than all of Americas Jewish community.!  This included some of the theoreticians of critical theory, which upended classical Marxist thought to add multiple factors besides economics that sit on us- ( some were in my father’s community-Adorno-Horkheimer- . Made famous by Hebert Marcuse, who was seen as an inspiration for the SDS in my day- except he repudiated the hippies and yippies. It has since been perverted into the current form of Critical Race Theory)]

It only lasted a few years, as Rosenzweig succumbed to ALS ( Lou Gehrig’s Disease). However, it was later reopened under Martin Buber and replicated throughout Germany- it was reincarnated in US as the Havurah movement and such mass education programs as Limmud.

It is still an educationally astounding format, even if it means I would have no business. It forces the leader to confront the core texts of Judaism and grapple with them.]

 

Buber Rosenzweig Translation

Translations are revolutionary: William Tyndale-Martin Luther-Moses Mendelsohn

…the unfamiliar, authentic quality of the original Biblical text, Rosenzweig and Buber made an effort to imitate certain characteristics of the original …to reproduce the cadence of the original Biblical text, and to imitate what they understood to be its “spoken” quality, by dividing any given section they were translating into “breath-units.”

Example, from Deut Haazinu

: כִּשְׂעִירִם עֲלֵי דֶשֶׁא
וְכִרְבִיבִים עֲלֵי עֵשֶׂב.

Robert Alter translation.)

 like showers on the green
and like cloudbursts on the grass.
[12](

Buber-Rosenzweig

wie Nebelrieseln übers Gesproß   Like foggy droplets on grass sprouts,
wie Streifschauer übers Gekräut   Like patchy showers on lawn.

Courtesy https://www.thetorah.com/article/die-schrift-a-non-territorial-translation-of-the-land

 

Der Stern der Erlösung The Star of Redemption

https://scontent.ftlv5-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/s720x720/20430159_10154905996967894_1212999727500839550_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=cdbe9c&_nc_ohc=DoZ8nVJ03HoAX_NCjm5&_nc_ht=scontent.ftlv5-1.fna&oh=edd40e510e6dedcd7da48a2eff63184b&oe=61250A14



 

The Magen David as a visual diagram of the key elements of Jewish Thought-For the first time we have a symbol with content: As the cross represents individual salvation for the Christian, so the Star now represents redemption for the world.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TheStarOfRedemptionEng.svg


We see the intertwined triangles. On one triangle are the three key elements of that which is: God-the Universe-The Human Being. All three are completely disparate elements. How can they interact? That is the second triangle. God relates to the universe through the act of creation;
 relates to them human being through the revelation of his presence; the Human being relates to the world through the act of redemption.

 The Star of Redemption does not lead us out of this world beyond reality. Rather it concludes with the stepping out into the world with the task of proving the truth in the world. "About death …", are the first words of the book. Rosenzweig starts out with a reality that is experienced very personally. "Into life …", are his last words. The truth of revelation leads into the reality of life when it is proved [bewährt]. After completing The Star of Redemption Rosenzweig felt that he now had to personally face up to proving the truth and not avoid reality by continuing to write books any longer. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/franz-rosenzweig

Quotes:

Nothing Jewish is alien to me ( a play on Roman writer; Love brings to life whatever is dead around us. "Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto", or "I am human, and I think nothing human is alien to me. Nichts Judisches ist mir fremd.)

 

“All future events are merely a reproduction of the first moment of Love, giving birth to itself from an inner womb that continuously fertilizes itself. Love carries in itself its everlasting renewed beginning.”
“There is no act of love toward one’s neighbor that falls into the void. Just because the act was realized blindly, it must appear somewhere as effect. Somewhere,”
― 
Franz Rosenzweig, The Star of Redemption

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/192604.Franz_Rosenzweig

"[2Franz Rosenzweig

·         The knowledge of everything knowable is not yet wisdom

Franz Rosenzweig, Nahum Norbert Glatzer (1955). “On Jewish Learning”, p.86, Univ of Wisconsin Press

 To have found God is not an end but in itself a beginning.

https://www.azquotes.com/author/43434-Franz_Rosenzweig

·         Philosophy takes it upon itself to throw off the fear of things earthly, to rob death of its poisonous sting.

o    The Star of Redemption (1921), p. 3.

·         Cognition is autonomous; it refuses to have any answers foisted on it from the outside. Yet it suffers without protest having certain questions prescribed to it from the outside (and it is here that my heresy regarding the unwritten law of the university originates). Not every question seems to me worth asking. Scientific curiosity and omnivorous aesthetic appetite mean equally little to me today, though I was once under the spell of both, particularly the latter. Now I only inquire when I find myself inquired of. Inquired of, that is, by men rather than by scholars. There is a man in each scholar, a man who inquires and stands in need of answers. I am anxious to answer the scholar qua man but not the representative of a certain discipline, that insatiable, ever inquisitive phantom which like a vampire drains whom it possesses of his humanity.

o    in Franz Rosenzweig: His Life and Thought (1961/1998), p. 9

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Franz_Rosenzweig

-Dealing with ALS and Death

Rosenzweig suffered from the muscular degenerative disease Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (also known as Lou Gehrig's disease). Towards the end of his life, he had to write with the help of his wife, Edith, who would recite letters of the alphabet until he indicated for her to stop, continuing until she could guess the word or phrase he intended (or, at other times, Rosenzweig would point to the letter on the plate of his typewriter). They also developed a communication system based on him blinking his eyes.

Rosenzweig's final attempt to communicate his thought, via the laborious typewriter-alphabet method, consisted in the partial sentence: "And now it comes, the point of all points, which the Lord has truly revealed to me in my sleep, the point of all points for which there—". The writing was interrupted by his doctor, with whom he had a short discussion using the same method. When the doctor left, Rosenzweig did not wish to continue with the writing, and he died on the night of 10 December 1929, in Frankfurt, the sentence left unfinished.[9]

Rosenzweig was buried on 12 December 1929. There was no eulogy; Buber read Psalm 73 The quote is on his monument.[10]




https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/FFM_Franz-Rosenzweig-Gedenktafel.jpg



 Monument to Franz Rosenzweig on the wall to his house:

He was the trail-blazer of the Jewish-Christian dialogue

Companion of Martin Buber

Master of the translation into German of the Bible

Founder of the Free Jewish Academy in Frankfurt AM

Quote: Thus I am always with you( Ps  73:23)


This is an audio-visual rendition of the thought of Rosenzweig, as described by faculty of the Catholic University of Portugal .As Catholics, they have a very good understanding of the philosophy of the Jewish Rosenzweig.

 This is the direct link to the video on Rosenzweig.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0C3QxVkWB8&list=PLxjc3h0xSwvPFbOEiqM-UovkVt65l-B4N&index=9&t=85s



Wednesday, July 28, 2021

JUDAISM IN TRANSITION ( 1970)

 

This is a reference pice for my essays on Kaplan and Heschel


JUDAISM IN TRANSITION ( 1970 -original paper for Dr Moshe Davis-written c 1980, during debate on acceptance of women at JTS- abridged and published in Jewish Spectator, 1982)

Proposal for a Conservative Mechanism for Creative Adaptation

The Conservative Movement has come to a cross-road since the tabling of resolution on the ordination of women as Rabbis by the faculty of the Jewish Theological Seminary. At stake, even more than the issue of women's status within Judaism, is the purpose and meaning of the Conservative Movement: what is to be the rational for adhering to tradition or to change, what is to be its process for decision making, and what its direction for the future.

It is the contention of this paper that the mechanism of direction be kept as open and flexible as possible as to allow a maximum of responses to the needs of Judaism entering the Twenty First Century. The following is a discussion of the nature of change within Judaism in modern times, the question of making projections into the future, and a methodology for coping with the task. Hopefully, this will serve as a stimulus for healthy debate within the Movement that will lead to a clearer self-understanding.

PAST:

The most recent "earthquakes" of Jewish consciousness have been the Holocaust and the birth of Israel. To these events, no formal theological or halakhic response has seriously developed, not only within the Conservative Movement, but in American Judaism as a whole (Viz Robert Hammer, " Not to Mourn " Conservative Judaism,  Vol.25, Summer, 1971).

Mordecai Kaplan, in his response.to the symposium of Response,of Winter, 1970, suggested that Judaism was still reeling from the impact of the Emancipation, some two centuries ago. Similar thoughts have been developed by David Rudavsky in Emancipation and. Adjustment, and Jacob Neusner in Judaism in a Secular Age.

The crisis of modern Judaism must be traced back even farther; the sense of "gevalt"„ which has become in our generation a reflex, can be seen to be rooted in early modern times as early as the late 15th and 16th centuries. Certainly that is the case of European Jewish history. One can say that since the Spanish expulsion, the Jewish people have been faced with constant internal challenge to the fundamentals of belief. The past centuries have seen the rise and demise of .radical Lurianic mysticism, the Sabbatian movement, the Frankists heresy, the anti-intellectual revolt of Hassidism; all of this preceded the modern developments of Reform, Haskalah, Neo-Orthodoxy, and so forth.

The solution. of the "Jewish problem" was an issue long before the Zionist theoreticians began to speak of its resolution, or before Hitler's perversion of the issue.

At no point, from early modern times till now, is it possible to speak of a "normative Judaism"; the early Reform is as Jewish a model as is Habad,, and both are less radical than their Sabbatian predecessors.

PRESENT

To be aware of having been in a state of continued crisis is insufficient; there must be an adequate response at each step that meets the needs of the generation in each case. Toynbee proposed that a civilization must constantly meet new challenges and respond to them in order to survive.

We may question if, indeed' in modern times, we are above the laws of history (or sociology or economics.)  With each response in each age, we may have lost some of the resiliency of the preceding era. Early Reform was a. response to the Enlightenment and Emancipation; Conservatism in America, a response to the dislocation, socially and

spiritually, of East European immigrants; Zionism, a response to the revival of nationalism and the death of universalism in the 19th and 20th century. Each response was sufficient in its time for the needs of Jewry. Yet each may have left Jewish civilization weaker than before.

As new challenges arise, will any of the various bodes, movements organizations create a form of Judaism or forms of Judaism that will have vigor and. vitality to maintain the Eternal People? Will the Conservative Movement, which lays claim to having inherited the mantel of 'normative" Judaism, be able to come to grips with the future? As much as we are affected by the past Emancipation or Holocaust or the rebirth of Israeli we are even more directly affected by developments of the Present. Our Weltanschaunq changes as rapidly as the Paris haute contour change designs. A summary glance of the "relevant issue" that have the front pages of popular media and attention over the past several years is sufficient: the race to the moon; Civil Rights; domino theory;counter culture; Death of God; the imperial Presidency; the Great Society;the Limits of Growth; Born again Christianity.

 

The list can go on extensively. Each theme becomes, in its moment, the regnant concern of all educated, sophisticated people, and then spreads to the public at large by the time the. "cultural elites" have moved on to new outlooks.

Life-styles change as quickly as the ZEITGEIST. The flight from the city became a flight from suburbia; gratification from a two- car garage has become gratification from a small gas-saver.The study of science as a popular avenue -of academic studies has been replaced by an emphasis on the Master of Business Administration.

The American Jew dwells in the mist of a maelstrom.

Whether it is ideology that determines the structures of society, or the machinery of production that determine our beliefs can be left to Engel or Marx for debate. Certainly, the number of factors, each of different weight and direction, that affect the American Jew are legion. The open society makes possible a breakdown of familial and community identity and the destruction of traditional bonds, while "Holocaust" and "Israel" serve to strengthen the Jewish identity. A strong Jewish identity, at the same time, is no longer incompatible with inter­marriage, even when the other partner remains a non-Jew.

THE ART OF PROGNOSTICATION

What approach shall the Conservative Movement take in such an era?

Many have proposed "agendas” for Judaism, such as Eli. Ginsberg's Agenda for American Jews. Jacob Neusner suggested a better defined, more unified Conservative Movement to be able to play a significant role in a fragmented Jewish community ( Judaism in a Secular Age, "Agenda for Conservative Judaism , pp.I41 ff)

Can there be an agenda? The unified field theory proved elusive for the genius of Einstein; I fear that a unified agenda may also be elusive.

Prophecy has progressed from the ecstasy of Saul dancing and singing to Isaiah’s majestic poetry to its modern form, charts and statistics of the "think tank". The procedure is not to deliver the "ultimate word", but to establish multiple possible and probable scenarios. Such was the approach of a book, The Year 2000. a project of the Hudson Institute (Kahn and Weiner). Looking back over the past millennia, they discerned thirteen trends in Western Civilization, among which are the accumulation of scientific and technological knowledge. population growth, urbanization, literacy, and an increasing tempo of change.

Given these thirteen trends, it was difficult for them to project definitely for even a few decades; they proposed instead„ plausible alternatives. First, a Standard World, based. on fairly unchanging. continuation of present trends; secondly, eight. Canonical variations, subdivided into three groups. In addition to this, they suggest the possibility of scientific developments unforeseeable. at present. that could radically alter all predictions, - and even offer some nightmare scenarios.

The Conservative Movement must be able to deal with all eventualities,  especially those that touch upon the core of Jewish existence , ­the decline of traditional religion and the regeneration of religious inquiry. Both are not future eventualities, but realities occurring simultaneously, with which we must be able to come to grips.

A Methodology for Conservative Judaism.

Given a multi-faceted picture for the coming decades, it will be difficult, if not impossible for the Conservative Movement to adopt a strong, clear - cut position on any issue that will be acceptable to the Movement as a whole. By the time that all the various branches and wings of the Movement have fully taken size of situation and need, approached a degree of unity and agreement, and undertaken an organized response to the specific issue, that issue may itself have disappeared, been replaced by another issue radically different, or, have come to such a point that the Conservative stance, by the time it is achieved, is irrelevant or ignored.

 

Turn -abouts in public thought and interest can occur in five year cycles, (or even shorter); the Conservative Movement judging by the contents of Mordecai Waxman's Tradition and Change is still debating many of the same issues of fifty years ago. The question of the status of women has been an issue for many years now; attitudes toward mixed marriages, a makat medinah for a decade, are yet being formulated. Israel has been a State for over thirty years, and only recently has there been an attempt to create a Conservative Zionist Movement; The Holocaust has yet to elicit a specific development from within the Conservative Movement. (Both topics are mentioned in passing in Seymour Siegel's Conservative Judaism and Jewish lay) published by the Rabbinical Assembly.)

Nevertheless, the Conservative Movement has become the largest of the major variants of American Judaism, despite its lack of ideology or resolution (or perhaps because of it). Marshall Sklare promulgated his well-known contention that the movement grew because of a fortunate social and economic development in American Jewry ( Conservative Judaism: An American Religious Movement)

We must take it seriously, with the realization that the current forms of Reform and Orthodox are equally products of American society. Each Rabbi and his (or her) congregation has, in Conservative Jewry, developed a working ideology that has fit the needs of the particular congregation at its particular moment in history.

 

We bear burden, as a consequence, of appearing parve, neither Reform nor Orthodox, and feel apologetic, as we express "What is Conservative Judaism" to those wishing to learn while standing on one leg. The very strength and hallmark of Judaism, which we are proud to flaunt - namely its openness to ideas and development - becomes, in terms of Conservative Judaism, it appears, its shortcoming,

We need a new conception of Conservative Judaism to fit the reality of our movement. Our uniqueness is our being "holistic" a more contemporary term than "Catholic Israel" we deal with the entire being of Judaism. Jewish Community Center and Federations can only deal with the body; Jewish intellectualism ( a la New York Jews.) Jewish secularism, Yiddishism, can deal only with the mind, as can an only academic approach to, Judaism; the classical Reform and today's left wing Reform on the one hand, and Baalei Teshuvah Yeshivot, the Hasidic: and Yeshivah movements concentrate on the heart.

 In our terms, as Rosenzweig postulated, "Nothing Jewish is alien." Herein is our hallmark; Peoplehood; a faith in one God; a commitment to expressing that faith in life of mitzvot.

Reform originally denigrated peoplehood, and has not, today, developed a commitment to that which has held true throughout Jewish history: an expression of the faith through a pattern of life. Orthodoxy, in its various manifestations has peoplehood: faith, and the commitment to a life of mitzvot but this is at the cost of mind - at the expense of bifurcating critical thought from Judaism: of a split mentality. All developments within Conservative Judaism ,in all its manifestations, are reflections of these fundamental characteristics; hence, of all expressions of modern Judaism, secular or religious, only Conservative Judaism can claim to be not a "sticking to ritualism" nor a watering down of Judaism" but rather to be the most legitimate of all Jewish developments in our time. Such self-surety must stand at the base of Conservative Judaism.

Within these considerations, all variations of Conservative Judaism are not only tolerated, but welcome. Rather than being a sign of organizational weakness, vacuity, or lack of purpose,.,. this reflects the true "attire of classical Judaism. It is the Essence of Judaism.."

At the beginning, I posited that since early modern times, the fabric of Jewish life has been sorely worn; however, even in the best of times, the Jewish outlook has been a variegated as Joseph's -"coat of many colors." We are only now discovering that instead of the unitary image presented by the Mishna and Talmud of Judaism in the time of the Second Temple and thereafter, there was a highly dynamic religion of many different trends. Even within the forerunner of classical Judaism, Pharisaism, there is the divergence between the schools of Hillel and Shamai; the Talmud records,"Elu ve Elu",both are of divine authority. The Conservative Movement is oft described as the Pharisaic movement of our day, and we must recognize, then, that within ourselves, there are many legitimate schools of thought, and Elu ve Elu , all are right, and must be given free room to develop. If, in Temple times, there was a Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai, so, in present structure of the Conservative movement, legitimization must be made for a Beit Mordecai,Belt Heschel, Beit Shaul, and the structure must be arranged to enable each to flourish, unimpeded by the other.

A variety of possible constructs comes to mind. One could, for instance, consider certain central planks, to which, in general, the different Batim of Conservative Judaism could assent, with liberty to interpret the implications of these planks left explicitly open. One could take Mordecai Kaplan's four areas of agreement (see Waxman, Tradition and Change, pp.214-215): 1)Eretz Yisrael, 2) The primacy of Religion, 3) The maximum plenitude of Jewish content, 4) The enco uragement of scientific learning.

 

Under the plank of Eretz Yisrael, one could find a group which considers Israel to be the effective exclusive, legitimate center of the Jewish people; one could also accept a group which would see Israel as an equal focus in the Jewish ellipse with American Jewry as the other focus. Under primacy of religion, there could be a wide variety of theological schools: pantheistic, naturalistic, trans-natural, existential, traditional. Under maximum plentitude, one could conceive of groups for whom Halakha is the central concern, to be relatively unchanged, to those who would make extensive changes but only in accord with traditional methods of exegesis, to those who would remake halakha entirely, based on contemporary conditions. In the area of scientific inquiry, there could also be a range from limited acceptance of scientific criticism on the Bible, to acceptance as "written under divine inspiration" to an understanding of Bible as the expression of human yearning for the divine.

An alternative model for the structuring of Conservative Judaism could be derived from the philosopher Wittgenstein who suggested that, in search of the understanding of groups, one should not look for universal characteristics:

“We see a complicated network of similarities overlapping and criss-crossing sometimes overall similarities, sometimes similarities of detail. . .   "family resemblances". "An example of his concept is to picture a set with the features ABCDE, with members in that set, edcba„ each of which have four of the five features, with one missing in each member. Thus                                         .

e

d

c

b

a

ABCD

ABCE

ABDE

ACDE

BCDE

(from Wittgenstein, The Philosophical investigation, Edited by.George Pitcher, pp.188-189)

Under such a format, we might posit many positions, most of which would have to be accepted by each Bayit within the Conservative Movement. For example, one might place on one plane, all possible concepts within Conservative Judaism (only a few are listed herein):

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

God as spiritual being

God as power for salvation

God as I-Thou

Torah as revelation of God

Torah as search for God

Torah as binding

Torah as guiding

Halakha with moderate change

Halakha reconstructed

 

One can conceive of a Bayit which would include A,E,G, and I; their platform could be: "We conceive of God as a spiritual entity which elicited from the Jewish people the Torah, a guiding source of authority, and in recognition of this, a Jew follows the Halakha as revised extensively to meet the changed needs of modern society."

Or Bayit BEFH-: "We see God as the power that makes for salvation, and the Torah as the search of the. Jewish people for God. The Torah, as the product of the Jewish People, is binding in authority, and Jewish law, as the expression of the people, shall be followed with only slight modification."

The possibilities are legion.

Such a structure exists, informally, in that the members of the Movement, and their various bodies, are of radically different dis­positions. This is particularly so of the hard core of the Movement, the members of the Rabbinical Assembly, who can best serve as the leaders of the movement, by being both learned and in touch with the realities of American Jewry. By providing a structuring to give expression to this great variety, confusion can be changed to direction and action.

It would be possible to produce a multiple of Battim in the style of Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai, along several parameters: strictness or liberalness of interpretation of Jewish law; traditional philosophical, Rabbinic, or non-traditional theology; ethnic or universal oriented; high synagogue or low synagogue (Havurah) oriented; rational or mystical. For example, along three-dimensions of observance, theology, and ambience (religious - mystical or ethnic-secular), one can see the following grouping

 



The old demarcation - Left - Right .- Center - is of no validity in such a structure.

There is no canonicity to this grouping; many more or fewer division could be accommodated according to various modalities; some could closely be aligned with others and some could be at variance with every other one. Such a structure would be flexible enough to allow for creative development in several directions at once. Certain Battim would increase in backing with time, others might shrink or be merged, yet, given the rapid changes facing the American Jewish community, could regrow or be revitalized to match a new reality.

The individual Jew, at present lost in attempt to define for himself what it means to be a Conservative Jew, would then have specific "concepts", tendencies, "trends" to identify with and chose as meeting his/her Jewish needs and beliefs.

To structure and co-ordinate such an organization would require administrative ingenuity and talent, which can easily be found in the Rabbinical Assembly. An example might be taken from American Orthodoxy, which, according to Charles Liebman (Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life; AJYB 1965 ), although splintered into many small groups, has been experiencing a revival and is thriving despite predictions of immanent demise made a few decades ago.

We could not afford, however, to leave things to the will of heaven and structural anarchy; the roof organization would be vital. Jewish educattion is too costly a venture to split, as goes for the training of Rabbinate, or the machinery for placement position papers and policies vis a vis the rest of the Jewish community or the general public.

This multi-formed approach should be better able to coordinate the varied institutions that are now growing in American Jewry within, or independent of, formal synagogues. A new United. Synagogue would. then be commissioned to reflect the divergencies, and house under one roof, the following types of Betei Knesset:

1)    The standard large synagogue/Hebrew school/ center complex which would meet the needs of people who are looking for either the programming variety possible in such a large institution, or who are looking, admittedly, for a less intense Jewish involvement -suffice with a pleasant service, a good school, and some pleasant social gatherings. This should not be scoffed at, as through these, we reach the great bulk of the Jewish community.

2)    The large standard synagogue, with all the above facilities, coordinating, as its main aspect, or in addition to its regular programming, Havuroth, as is the case in many large synagogues today. The different Havuroth could give expression to the different manifestations of Conservative Judaism, while all sharing the same central facilities.

3)    Independent Havuroth, which succeed in drawing people into Jewish life who would otherwise remain untouched by more traditional Jewish structures. Since the Havurah has started to become a movement of its own, with a national convention, it would be vital for the Conservative Movement to be able to work through this vehicle.

4)    Stiebel complex. In Jerusalem, there are many buildings which house several services, simultaneously, or in succession, of different colorings -Hasidic, straight davening, Yekish. Each one reflects the different mood, traditions, and backgrounds of the worshippers gathered therein, yet they are all brought in proximity and fellowship by being under one roof, constantly intermingling upon entering, leaving, and just milling around. Some synagogues have several services in recognition of different needs of the congregants; rather than be considered a sign of lack of cohesion, it should be a source of pride. Under one roof, there could be a highly traditional service ("orthodox"), a standard Conservative service, of choir, Cantor, and Rabbi, cum sermonis; an alternative service emphasizing variation in music, creative readings, different formats for seating; a purely meditative service, of as yet unimagined format, since it is better to .meditate in shul, than in ashram. All could run simultaneously, with all members entering together, and following services, rejoining for a joint Oneg Shabbat or Kiddush, wherein would be preserved the atmosphere of a congregation and community.

5)         Jewish outreach centers. We are embarassed by the drive and success of those most committed to avoiding the. Twentieth Century in being able to reach out to people who have had no traditional background. Both the Baptists and Habad put us to shame. In Houston, there is a Main Point, a joint outreach project of the local Southern Baptist churches; in this facility, every program and course is offered to the young person, especially the single, with no strings attached, with no membership fees, but with a lavish helping of religion. Habad has done equally well in attracting Jewish students who had no previous Jewish connection. Not everyone is searching for the intense authoritarianism of a Habad„ but many young adults, singles, or senior adults, are waiting for someone to reach out to them. Half of all Jews belong to no synagogues, yet most Jews, in surveys call themselves "Conservative"; they have to be pulled in with an open arm, not a call for dues.

 

 

 

Summation

Under such an approach, Conservative Judaism will be able to legitimately be viewed as normative Judaism, reflecting both the histor­ical pluralism which has been Judaism's intellectual hallmark and the will to expressing Jewish faith by.living accordingly. This will allow freedom of conscience, not _only for. those who feel that certain categories of.halakhka are immutable but also for those who believe, as well, that halakha must be adjusted where necessity demands; one need not close out the other. Under such an approach, those within the Reform movement, who "lean" towards Conservatism will find, within it, a body of like-minded colleagues among who will feel entirely at ease; Reconstructionism could, with full intellectual integrity, reunite, keeping it’s own identity; those among the Orthodox, who have recognized the intellectual arguments of modern criticism, will find the way open to aligning themselves within those groups .in the Conservative movement whose attitude to halakha is similar, without feeling themselves involved with colleagues who, in their eyes, would be too radical. Sitting in the center and opening to new blood in both directions, the Conservative Movement could serve to become the Sanhedrin for mainstream variants of Judaism in the Twenty-first Century.

 " We are one" would not be a slogan for the mindless melting of ideology and surrender of principles, but instead, the practical meeting of creative bodies for common goals. Chancellor Gerson Cohen, in referring to the tabling of the proposal to ordain women has offered hopes of seeing the time when we shall be able to tolerate differences within our ranks. To adopt such an outlook would be to concretize that hope. It would be revolutionary, and be justifiable, as in the words of the previous Chancellor: "Revolutions can be justified in only one way, by being successful."