Sunday, June 26, 2022

Judaism on One Leg- Introduction: The People

 

Judaism on One Leg- Introduction: The People


Link to the video of June 25

https://youtu.be/9zU_9z_8tj8




( Using extracts, from Encyclopedia Britannica ,"Judaism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2014. Web. 03 2014 . )

<http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/307197/Judaism>. Salo Wittmayer Baron-editor of the article  Quotes are in red letter font

 


Suggested Readings for Beginners:

Here is one such list:

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-10-best-introduction-to-judaism-books/


If you want to create your own Jewish library:

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/top-100-jewish-books/

 

For access to all the key source texts of Judaism in Hebrew and English translation:

https://www.sefaria.org/texts

 


Don’t worry- you don’t need to build another bookcase-many of these are available for download!


If you want to watch and listen:

https://www.bimbam.com/judaism-101/

https://unpacked.education/

https://www.jewbelong.com/

 

 

******************************************************************************************************************* 

 

Al Regel Achat

 

I start my discussion with the famous tale of “al regel achat”.


 שוב מעשה בנכרי אחד שבא לפני שמאי,

א"ל גיירני ע"מ שתלמדני כל התורה כולה כשאני עומד על רגל אחת דחפו,

באמת הבנין שבידו 

 .

בא לפני הלל גייריה אמר לו דעלך סני לחברך לא תעביד

. זו היא כל התורה כולה, ואידך פירושה הואץ זיל גמור.

שבת · לא א

 

There was another incident involving one gentile who came before Shammai and said to Shammai: Convert me on condition that you teach me the entire Torah while I am standing on one foot. Shammai pushed him away with the builder’s cubit in his hand. This was a common measuring stick and Shammai was a builder by trade. The same gentile came before Hillel. He converted him and said to him: That which is hateful to you do not do to another; that is the entire Torah, and the rest is its interpretation. Go study.

 

 Lesson 1  

ISRAEL (THE JEWISH PEOPLE)

A triumvirate at the top

ישראל ואוריתא וקודשא בריך הוא חד הוא

Yisrael vOraita vKudsha Brichu CHad Hu-based on a kabbalistic statement:

The people of Israel- The Torah- and the  Holy One, Blessed be He, are one.

In other words, all intertwined.

 

The opening of the Kuzari, by R Yehudah HaLevy

Philosophy can not be the source of truth, since all arguments can be turned on their heads. Christianity and Islam claim their truth from the account of the Jewish people. It is in the collective experience of the people of Israel then, that we derive the truth.

 There is no word for religion in the Bible- the word we use is “dat”, which is a Persian loan word- Law. Esther- “ their laws are different”. Our word” religion” from a later Latin concept” religere” rebinding.

Judaism means both a religion in the modern- sense- a system of beliefs-and the totality of the creation of the Jewish people as the response to its belief that it has a mission from the Divine and that mission is embodied in the Torah, in its many manifest meanings. That puts us radically apart from Christianity and Islam as well as pure philosophy. The “ faith” part of Judaism is not ours only- it is open to all. What is unique is our path( halakhah) and our method (Torah).

So, we start with the people

 

CHOICE AND COVENANT

The line in the prayer book just before the morning and evening Shma,” who has chosen thy people Israel in love” and “who loves his people Israel”

 

Made explicit in Deuteronomy 7:6–8 ( New Jewish Version):

 

For you are a people consecrated to the Lord your God: of all the peoples on earth the Lord your God chose you to be His treasured people. It is not because you are the most numerous of peoples that the Lord set His heart on you and chose you—indeed you are the smallest of peoples; but it was because the Lord loved you and kept the oath He made with your fathers that the Lord freed you with a mighty hand and rescued you from the house of bondage, from the power of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

The background : disobedience of humankind: Adam-Eve, Cain-Abel, Noah-flood, Babel.  God charts out a new path through Abraham and his descendants are singled out not merely as the object of the divine blessing but also as its channel to all humanity.

 ... mutually binding agreement, a covenant between the two parties.   Brit bein Habetarim, brit milah. Late, brit at Sinai with Torah. The content of the covenantal obligations thus formalized was Torah...

 This obligation is expressed in the sense of, mitzwot, singular mitzwa, commandments- obligations= that are part of Torah. 

Hence, phrasing of the Torah blessings:“He who chose us from among all the peoples and gave us His Torah,” connects election with revelation ( some movements in modern times, uncomfortable with this emphasis—Rabbi Kaplan- “ asher keravanu” who has brought us close- but that is a euphemism. “Chosen” can be a problem, as Fiddler on the Roof= chose someone else.)

 Abraham and his descendants, for example, were seen as the means by which the estrangement of disobedient humankind from God was to be overcome.

 Torah was the formative principle. Israel was to be   ממלכת כהנים גוי קדוש

a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:6) functioning within humanity and for its sake

 Isaiah 43:10

אַתֶּ֤ם עֵדַי֙ נְאֻם־יְהֹוָ֔ה וְעַבְדִּ֖י אֲשֶׁ֣ר בָּחָ֑רְתִּי לְמַ֣עַן תֵּ֠דְע֠וּ וְתַאֲמִ֨ינוּ לִ֤י וְתָבִ֙ינוּ֙ כִּֽי־אֲנִ֣י ה֔וּא לְפָנַי֙ לֹא־נ֣וֹצַר אֵ֔ל וְאַחֲרַ֖י לֹ֥א יִהְיֶֽה׃ {ס}     

 אֲנִ֧י יְהֹוָ֛ה קְרָאתִ֥יךָֽ בְצֶ֖דֶק וְאַחְזֵ֣ק בְּיָדֶ֑ךָ וְאֶצׇּרְךָ֗ וְאֶתֶּנְךָ֛ לִבְרִ֥ית עָ֖ם לְא֥וֹר גּוֹיִֽם׃

I the LORD, in My grace, have summoned you,
And I have grasped you by the hand.
I created you, and appointed you a light of nations-c

לִפְקֹ֖חַ עֵינַ֣יִם עִוְר֑וֹת לְהוֹצִ֤יא מִמַּסְגֵּר֙ אַסִּ֔יר מִבֵּ֥ית כֶּ֖לֶא יֹ֥שְׁבֵי חֹֽשֶׁךְ׃ d

Opening eyes deprived of light,-d
Rescuing prisoners from confinement,
From the dungeon those who sit in darkness.

  

Religious faith, far from being restricted to or encapsulated in the cult, found expression in the totality of communal and individual life.

One of the important recurring themes of the prophetic movement was the adamant rejection of any tendency to limit divine sovereignty to the partial area of “religion,” understood as the realm of the priesthood and cult….

Pharisaic Judaism and its continuation, Rabbinic Judaism, resolutely held to the idea of the all-pervasive functioning of Torah, …,

 

 

ISRAEL AND THE NATIONS

 

The Jewish people were not to be seen as controlling the nations of the world, but of serving, “ Or LaGoyim”.  1) The non-Jew had, from Jewish perspective, a separate path to God-7 mitzvoth benei Noach- a universal moral, not faith, code.

.2) Membership in the community, at the start, was by descent, eventually defined as descent through the mother

3) The  non-Jew would be absorbed through marriage and eventually, through a status of “ ger”, the foreigner who has come to dwell in our midst ( individuals, sometimes, entire towns or community). Most close example—US citizenship- passed on by birth to US citizen or by naturalization.

Thus, Jews can not constitute a race; rather, the similarity of DNA among dispersed Jews world wide reflects a common history, without being exclusive and rejectionist.

 

THE SACRED LANGUAGE: HEBREW AND THE VERNACULAR TONGUES

Judaism sees the language of the people as essential to conveying and expressing the values of Judaism over the course of centuries and over thousands of miles.

Hebrew is imbued with a “ mystical” status, seen as the language upon which the universe is built (this is similar to position of Arabic in Islam). Thus, over the centuries, a Jew could comprehend Biblical , and Mishnaic Hebrew from a thousand and more years before, and with that, also study and pray with and conduct business with a Jew from any other part of the globe.Note: Christians could use Latin in Christian Europe, Muslims could use Arabic in North Africa and Asia—but only Jews could conduct their business globally!

 

 Aramaic, a cognate of Hebrew, functioned as the international or imperial language in official life and gained a foothold as a vernacular. The language of the Mishna, far from being a scholar’s dialect, seems to reflect popular speech, as did the Koine (common) 

 [Note: The Hebrew of the period of the 2nd Temple and the centuries following had a distinct format and structure from Biblical Hebrew. However, Jews, over the centuries, could comprehend both tyoes of Hebrew.]

In each land, Jews were multi-lingual-1) they used the Hebrew ( and Aramaic) in worship, study, and commerce, 2) the local language,3) created a patois of their own( Judeo  hyphen -Spanish( Ladino) German( Yiddish) Persian(Dzhidi), Arabic (arabiyya yahudiya) , often preserving the original language as spoken centuries before, in Hebrew script, with Hebrew loan words.

 

On of the greatest linguistic feats of all times was the rebirth of Hebrew from mostly read=written text, to an actively used modern language-within the course of a few decades.

 

THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL AND THE LAND OF ISRAEL

 

Closely related to the concept of Israel as the chosen, or covenant, people is the role of the land of Israel.

Promised to Abraham and Descendants

It is the goal of the Exodus

Many Biblical commands are specific to life in the land of Israel-shmittah, jubilee,first fruit, sacrifice, gleanings.

However, in contrast to the pagans, the God of Israel was God of all creation. When a city was destroyed, it was the local deity who was destroyed. For the Bible, if the city or land was destroyed, it was the result of the will of God, not from powerlessness.

 Thus, with the loss of land, the people did not lose their purpose. They were restored once, after the first fall, and thereby found the strength to overcome the second loss! (

Note- one Jewish family retained its roots in the land over these 1000s of years. The related community of Israelites, the Samaritans, never left, although they shrank to only a few hundred)

 

The daily worshipped reenforced this three times a day:

תִּשְׁכּוֹן

בְּתוֹךְ יְרוּשָׁלַֽיִם עִֽירְךָ כַּאֲשֶׁר דִּבַּֽרְתָּ, וְכִסֵּא דָוִד עַבְדְּךָ מְהֵרָה בְּתוֹכָהּ תָּכִין, וּבְנֵה אוֹתָהּ בִּנְיַן עוֹלָם בִּמְהֵרָה

 בְיָמֵֽינוּ: בָּרוּךְ אַתָּה יֻהֻוֻהֻ, בּוֹנֵה יְרוּשָׁלָיִם:

Dwell within Jerusalem Your city, as You spoke about, & the throne of David, Your servant, speedily prepare it within it, & build it an eternal structure speedily in our days. Blessed are You, L·rd, Who builds Jerusalem.

 

At every wedding:Ps 137

 אִֽם־אֶשְׁכָּחֵ֥ךְ יְֽרוּשָׁלָ֗͏ִם תִּשְׁכַּ֥ח יְמִינִֽי׃  

If I forget you, O Jerusalem,
let my right hand wither;b


The claassic definition of the the age of the Messiah is, in the words of Shmuel, one of the founders of what would become the Talmud:

דאמר שמואל אין בין העולם הזה לימות המשיח אלא שעבוד גלויות בלבד

Ain beyn yemot hamoshiach ele shibud galuyot bilvad( Shabbat 63a).

There is no difference between this world and the days of the Messiah except for the end of the servitude of exile.


 

Despite the Roman destruction of the Temple in 70, and the crushing and genocide of Jews in 135 at the fall of Bar Kochba, the Jewish community was able create the Mishna , the Midrash, the Talmud Yerushalmi, and later, the key texts of later Kabbalah and the most wide spread code of Jewish law, the Shulchan Arukh.

Best expression of longing:


ליבי במזרח / יהודה הלוי

קפיצה לניווטקפיצה לחיפוש

לִבִּי בְמִזְרָח וְאָנֹכִי בְּסוֹף מַעֲרָב

אֵיךְ אֶטְעֲמָה אֵת אֲשֶׁר אֹכַל וְאֵיךְ יֶעֱרָב

אֵיכָה אֲשַׁלֵּם נְדָרַי וָאֱסָרַי, בְּעוֹד

צִיּוֹן בְּחֶבֶל אֱדוֹם וַאֲנִי בְּכֶבֶל עֲרָב

יֵקַל בְּעֵינַי עֲזֹב כָּל טוּב סְפָרַד, כְּמוֹ

יֵקַר בְּעֵינַי רְאוֹת עַפְרוֹת דְּבִיר נֶחֱרָב!


My heart is in the east, and I in the uttermost west--

How can I find savour in food? How shall it be sweet to me?

How shall I render my vows and my bonds, while yet

Zion lieth beneath the fetter of Edom, and I in Arab chains?

A light thing would it seem to me to leave all the good things of Spain --

Seeing how precious in mine eyes to behold the dust of the desolate sanctuary.


There were constant attempts at return, invited back by Saladin, then later by Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent ( to be fair, before modern times, Moslem leaders were often more welcoming than their Christian counterparts). There was a wave of Hasidim that came in the 1700’s, a Yemenite wave in 1881, the same time as Bilu, before there was a Zionist movement. My father’s great grandfather and mother sold all their possessions at the age of 80 and moved to Safed around that time ( only to be murdered by the locals a few years later).

 

Modern Zionism- a consequence of the fact that Europe could not tolerate its Jews in the modern nationalist environment, something that would be repeated in the newly awakened nationalism of the Arab world. What began as a trickle became a wave and then a flood, as we all too well know. Eventually, both Europe and the Middle East would be emptied almost totally of their Jews. The political movement of modern Zionism, as envisioned and promoted by Herzl, became essential to Jewish survival. It would override the belief of the Orthodox world. That only God would bring about the return, at the end of days, and the belief of liberal and secular Jews, that the new world of enlightenment and revolution would welcome Jews with open arms.

 

In the 21 st century, it remains to be seen if a large and identifiable Jewish community ( as opposed to people whose ancestors happened to be Jews)  is viable and vibrant, outside of the land of Israel, or disconnected from it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, June 20, 2022

The [Un]wisdom Book of Wisdom, Koheleth, or Ecclesiastes

 


As a follow up to my discussion on Proverbs, Mishle, i digress to the counterpoint work, Koheleth, Ecclestiastes. which seems to set out to undo all of the claims of the wisdom of Wisdom, and, ineffect, challenge the Bible itself. How one earth could our sages have included it in our scriptures and why did the Christians decide to go along with this?


Follow this link for my discussion.

https://youtu.be/ntYBiYweT1I


First, an aside, at the other works of scepticism, such as this text

From Dialogue on Pessimism- Akkadian text- Babylonia c 1000 bce-

Between master and slave-the slave is the inciting knave in this tale

 DRIVE TO PALACE  - [Slave, listen to me!]    - Here I am, master, here I am! –

 [Quickly! Fetch me the chariot and hitch it up. I want to drive to the palace.   

 Drive, master, drive! It will be to your advantage. When he will see you, the king will give you honors. –

[O well, slave] I will not drive to the palace!  

 - Do not drive, master, do not drive! When he will see you, the king may send you God knows where, He may make you take a route that you do not know, He will make you suffer agony day and night.  

II – BANQUET  Quickly! Fetch me water for my hands, I want to dine!

 - Dine, master, dine! A good meal relaxes the mind! [ ] the meal of his god. To wash one´s hand passes the time!

- O well, slave, I will not dine!

- Do not dine, master, do not dine! To eat only when one is hungry, to drink only when one is thirsty is best for man!

...

This debate all ends with the master deciding that suicide is the only route--and 

 XI - CONCLUSION

- Slave, listen to me!

 - Here I am, master, here I am! - What then is good? To have my neck and yours broken, Or to be thrown into the river, is that good? - Who is so tall as to ascend to heaven? Who is so broad as to encompass the entire world? - O well, slave, I will kill you and send you first! -


To which, the slave replies, cleverly--

- Yes, but my master would certainly not survive me for three days!...


Here is a text of Koheleth, with Hebrew and English translation, which you can use to follow along. The text I used in the presentation was the New American Standard Version; Sefaria uses the 1985 JPS version. For those who can follow, the Hebrew is always the best first choice!

https://www.sefaria.org/Ecclesiastes.1?lang=bi

From the Opening

The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem.“Vanity of vanities,” says the Preacher,“Vanity of vanities! All is vanity.”. . .

דִּבְרֵי קֹהֶלֶת בֶּן־דָּוִד מֶלֶךְ בִּירוּשָׁלִָם׃

הֲבֵל הֲבָלִים אָמַר קֹהֶלֶת הֲבֵל הֲבָלִים הַכֹּל הָבֶל׃

מַה־יִּתְרוֹן לָאָדָם בְּכָל־עֲמָלוֹ שֶׁיַּעֲמֹל תַּחַת הַשָּׁמֶשׁ׃

דּוֹר הֹלֵךְ וְדוֹר בָּא וְהָאָרֶץ לְעוֹלָם עֹמָדֶת׃

What advantage does man have in all his work
Which he does under the sun?
A generation goes and a generation comes,
But the earth remains forever.

All things are wearisome; Man is not able to tell it.
The eye is not satisfied with seeing, Nor is the ear filled with hearing.
That which has been is that which will be, And that which has been done is that which will be done. So there is nothing new under the sun.10 Is there anything of which one might say, “See this, it is new”? Already it has existed for ages Which were before us.
11 There is no remembrance of earlier things; And also of the later things which will occur, There will be for them no remembrance Among those who will come later still.

כָּל־הַדְּבָרִים יְגֵעִים לֹא־יוּכַל אִישׁ לְדַבֵּר לֹא־תִשְׂבַּע עַיִן לִרְאוֹת וְלֹא־תִמָּלֵא אֹזֶן מִשְּׁמֹעַ׃

מַה־שֶּׁהָיָה הוּא שֶׁיִּהְיֶה וּמַה־שֶׁנַּעֲשָׂה הוּא שֶׁיֵּעָשֶׂה וְאֵין כָּל־חָדָשׁ תַּחַת הַשָּׁמֶשׁ׃

יֵשׁ דָּבָר שֶׁיֹּאמַר רְאֵה־זֶה חָדָשׁ הוּא כְּבָר הָיָה לְעֹלָמִים אֲשֶׁר הָיָה מִלְּפָנֵנוּ׃

אֵין זִכְרוֹן לָרִאשֹׁנִים וְגַם לָאַחֲרֹנִים שֶׁיִּהְיוּ לֹא־יִהְיֶה לָהֶם זִכָּרוֹן עִם שֶׁיִּהְיוּ לָאַחֲרֹנָה׃



Tuesday, June 14, 2022

The Wisdom of the Book of Wisdom, Proverbs

 


Introduction to Proverbs

 

 

A medieval depiction of King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba

The Book of Proverbs, Mishle in Hebrew, is, from it’s opening lines, intended as a guide from a father to his son, based, not only on the father’s teachings, but the mother’s guidance as well.

 

The opening line attributes it to King Solomon, an appropriate attribution, as he is described, in the historical record of the Book of Kings, as the wisest man, of world-wide renown. While it is hard to pinpoint an exact attribution, much material may well have been from his time. Different chapters in Proverbs have different attributes, such as the circles of scholars under King Hezekiah, or a King Lemuel. Much material may have come from other cultures and it has been noted that some material is from an Egyptian wisdom collection, "Wisdom of of Amenemope,” contemporaneous ( give or take a few centuries)  with Solomon.

 

Here is my discussion, in two separate videos:

https://youtu.be/Yl5QAnkF6FA, from June 4 and 11


https://youtu.be/C5KPYO6N3RQ





Monday, May 9, 2022

Can there be a Muslim Zionist?

 Can there be a Muslim Zionist?

This is the link to my discussion on May 7th, in honor of Israel Independence Day, followed by musical tributes to Israel from China, Japan, Korea, a song for the end of hatred sung by an Israeli Jewish and Arab duet, celebration of Jewish-Christian-Muslim co-existence with Bob Marley's One Love, the Hatikvah played in an Arab capital, and Hatikvah from this year's celebration in Jerusalem.

Here is the link

https://youtu.be/2jmZBGrL-E4


Here are my notes:


The first Arab, Muslim Zionist of modern times?

On Israel Independence Day 2022

 

Making  a case for Muslim Zionists

 

We have an on-going fight here is the US with those who claim to be for justice- and it is scary:

Essay by Gil Troy in Jewish Journal: https://jewishjournal.com/cover_story/347535/identity-zionism-seeking-zionist-and-jewish-renewal/

Last semester began with the Heritage study explaining why universities ignore this oldest and most plastic of hatreds: because many of those tasked with fighting campus bigotry are anti-Jewish bigots. Examining the tweets of hundreds of university Diversity, Inclusivity and Equity administrators, Jay P. Greene and James D. Paul found that of 633 tweets regarding little Israel, 96 percent criticized the Jewish State. Yet 62 percent of the 216 tweets regarding China were positive. One DIE administrator liked this Tweet: “Y’all love to add the word liberal in front of the most evil things and it’s unhingedddd. Wtf is a liberal Zionist? What’s next? Liberal Nazi? Liberal colonizer? Liberal murderer? Liberal imperialist? Liberal fascist?”

Do these people show any sympathy for the innocents murdered by ax this week in a well organized attack by terrorists from Jenin? Do these people ever denounce the call by leader of Hamas, Yahya Sinwar, who called on his fellow Palestinians this week to take axes and kill every Jew?

 

Part of the claim against a Jewish state stems from the conflict between Christian West and Muslim East. One of the long-standing sources of conflict- that Islam is in conflict with Jews as a whole, and with any right of Jews to a Jewish State in the land of Israel, and in particular, with any connection to Jerusalem. Our highly educated diversity officers would seem to be siding with the Muslim east—but is that true? Or is it the result of the same distortion that has afflicted our educated elites?

 

However, this is a distortion of Islam for political ends, and so the number of Moslem and Arab states that have opened relations with Israel, has increased over the years.

So while, Harvard Crimson lambasts Israel , the Moslem world has a different tack:

More and more Arabs and Muslims welcome Israel

Let’s take Turkey’s President, Erdogan, a right-wing Muslim traditionalist, who in the past has lambasted Israel:

https://www.jns.org/erdogan-sends-herzog-letter-marking-israel-independence-day/

In his letter to mark independence day, Erdoğan wrote: “On the occasion of the National Day of the State of Israel, I extend congratulation to Your Excellency and the people of Israel on behalf of my nation and myself. In the new period in our relations, heralded by Your Excellency’s visit to our country in March, I sincerely believe that the cooperation between our countries will develop in a way that serves our mutual national interests, as well as regional peace and stability.”

 

He concluded with wishes “for the health and happiness of Your Excellency, and the well-being and prosperity of the people of Israel.”

If Islam in principal opposed the right of Jews to a State in the Land of Israel, there would not have been peace treaties and formal and informal relations with Egypt, Jordan, now the Emirates, and numerous other Muslim states such as Sudan, Azerbaijan, Morocco. Indonesia , the largest Muslim country on earth, is now in the works.

But if Muslim states can be excused of choosing political expediency over principal, is there an Islamic foundation for Zionism?

If there are Christian Zionists, are there Muslim Zionists?

We have an early precedent:

First modern Zionist-sort of- The Sherif of Mecca

 

Hussein bin Ali, Sharif of Mecca and King of the Hejaz, until the Saudi family took over. His son, the Emir Feisal, leader of the Arab revolt against Ottomans in WWI ( Lawrence of Arabia fane). His other son, Abdullah, founded Transjordan ( Jordan), the lion’s part of the mandate of Palestine.

23 March 1918, in Al Qibla, the daily newspaper of Mecca, attested that Palestine was "a sacred and beloved homeland of its original sons", the Jews; "the return of these exiles to their homeland will prove materially and spiritually an experimental school for their [Arab] brethren." He called on the Arab population in Palestine to welcome the Jews as brethren and cooperate with them for the common welfare.

But what could he, as Sherif of Mecca, responsible for the holiest site in Islam, base himself upon?

 

Was there an Islamic Zionism in the Quran itself?

Abdul Hadi Palazzi (Arabicشيخ عبد الهادي بالاتسي), legally named Massimo Palazzi (born 24 January 1961) is the secretary general of the Italian Muslim Assembly, and the Khalifah for Europe of the Qadiri Sufi Order. Controversially in Muslim circles, as of April 2010, he not only supported Israel's right to exist but also encouraged Jews to re-settle in Hebron.[1]

"The Qur'an cannot deal with the State of Israel as we know it today, since that State came into existing in 1948 only, i.e., many centuries after the Qur'an itself was revealed. However, the Qur'an specifies that the Land of Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people, that God Himself gave that Land to them as heritage and ordered them to live therein. It also announces that—before the end of the time—the Jewish people will come from many different countries to retake possession of that heritage of theirs. Whoever denies this actually denies the Qur'an itself. If he is not a scholar, and in good faith believes what other people say about this issue, he is an ignorant Muslim. If, on the contrary, he is informed about what the Qur'an says and openly opposes it, he ceases to be a Muslim.[9]( Wikipedia)

 

 

http://www.templemount.org/quranland.html Essay on Jews and Israel

“Both the Jewish and Islamic Scriptures teach that God, through His chosen servant Moses, decided to free the offspring of Jacob from slavery in Egypt and to constitute them as heirs of the Promised Land. Whoever claims that Jewish sovereignty over the Land of Israel is something new and rooted in human politics denies divine revelation and divine prophecy as explicitly expressed in our Holy Books (the Bible and Koran).

The Qur'an relates the words by which Moses ordered the Israelites to conquer the Land:

"And [remember] when Moses said to his people: 'O my people, call in remembrance the favour of God unto you, when he produced prophets among you, made you kings, and gave to you what He had not given to any other among the peoples. O my people, enter the Holy Land which God has assigned unto you, and turn not back ignominiously, for then will ye be overthrown, to your own ruin.'" [Qur'an 5:20-21]

Moreover - and those who try to use Islam as a weapon against Israel always conveniently ignore this point - the Holy Qur'an explicitly refers to the return of the Jews to the Land of Israel before the Last Judgment - where it says: "And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd.'" [Qur'an 17:104]

Therefore, from an Islamic point of view, there is NO fundamental reason which prohibits Muslims from recognizing Israel as a friendly State.”

ON Jerusalem and Jews

JERUSALEM IN THE QUR'AN

The most common argument against Muslim acknowledgment of Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem is that, since al-Quds [Jerusalem] (4) is a Holy Place for Muslims, Muslims cannot accept that it is ruled by non-Muslims, because such acceptance amounts to a betrayal of Islam.

We read:

"...They would not follow thy direction of prayer (qiblah), nor art thou to follow their direction of prayer; nor indeed will they follow each other's direction of prayer..." (5)

All Qur'anic commentators explain that "thy qiblah" [direction of prayer for Muslims] is clearly the Ka'bah of Mecca, while "their qiblah" [direction of prayer for Jews] refers to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

To quote only one of the most important Muslim commentators, we read in Qadn Baydawn's Commentary:

"Verily, in their prayers Jews orientate themselves toward the Rock (sakhrah), while Christians orientate themselves eastwards..." (6)

In complete opposition to what "Islamic" fundamentalists continuously claim, the Book of Islam [the Qur'an] - as we have just now seen - recognizes Jerusalem as the Jewish direction of prayer.

Some Muslim commentators also quote the Book of Daniel (7) as a proof for this.

After reviewing the relevant Qur'anic passages concerning this matter, I conclude that, as no one denies Muslims complete sovereignty over Mecca, from an Islamic point of view - despite opposing, groundless claims - there is no reason for Muslims to deny the State of Israel - which is a JEWISH state - complete sovereignty over Jerusalem.

This from a chief Muslim scholar in Britain:

Dr Al-Husseini is a British imam who teaches a course on the Koran as part of interfaith studies at the Leo Baeck College, the Progressive rabbinic college in Finchley, north London.

 

 “You will find very clearly,” says Sheikh Dr Muhammad Al-Husseini, “that the traditional commentators from the eighth and ninth century onwards have uniformly interpreted the Koran to say explicitly that Eretz Yisrael has been given by God to the Jewish people as a perpetual covenant. There is no Islamic counterclaim to the Land anywhere in the traditional corpus of commentary.”

One of the texts he has taught is the following verse in the Koran (5:21), “O my people! Enter the Holy Land which God has decreed for you, and turn back on your heels otherwise you will be overturned as losers.”

“ Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (838-923), who says the remark is “a narrative from God… concerning the saying of Moses… to his community from among the children of Israel and his order to them according to the order of God to him, ordering them to enter the holy land.”

Al-Tabari, Dr Al-Husseni says, is “our Rashi”, the founder of tafsir, “the science of exegesis” — the Arabic word is similar to pesher, Hebrew for interpretation. “One of the key rules of Islamic exegesis by which Islamic scholarship is bound is that the authority to interpret lies in the hands of the Prophet and of the Prophets’ Companions alone,” he says, “Nobody can go to the text and just freely interpret the text for their own purposes. This is really important… because if the Prophet, or one of his Companions, has given an interpretation, then we are bound by it.”

The Muslim commentators may differ over exactly where “the Holy Land” is — one says the area around Mount Sinai, another the Levant. But what is significant, Dr Al-Husseini, is that “they are pointing to the same area — it is not Egypt, Saudi or Iraq.”

The Arabic for “the holy land”, al-ard al-muqaddasa, is close to the Hebrew, eretz kodesh and refers to this piece of land rather than other sites sacred to Muslims.

If Muslims can be Zionists, so can we!!